Tuesday, November 29, 2011

Toronto Mayor Rob Ford to seek 2.5-per-cent property-tax hike

Toronto residents will be asked to pay 2.5-per-cent more in property taxes at a time of cuts to city spending as Mayor Rob Ford continues his austerity crusade with the proposed budget for next year.
The mayor is attempting to reverse a steady increase in spending – an especially tall task in municipal government, where Mr. Ford requires buy-in from a majority of council. Toronto residents get their first glance at how Mr. Ford plans to do that when the wraps come off the 2012 budget starting Monday.

Proposed cuts would shave close to $50-million off the city’s total spending, sources familiar with the budget say. At the same time, the city is counting on taxes to cover a greater share of its planned $9.35-billion budget, which also includes revenue from transfer payments, user fees and other sources. A growing assessment base and the proposed tax hike are expected to add close to $100-million to the city’s coffers, sources say.
Mr. Ford has been clear about his desire to shrink the size of Toronto’s government and reduce costs across the board. For too long, he argues, the city has lived beyond its means, relying on one-time revenue and bailouts from the province to balance its books.
But curbing spending is proving to be a greater task than the mayor envisioned when he promised voters he could cut costs and preserve services by finding the “gravy” at city hall – proof his critics say that there is no gravy after all.
The proposed cut to next year’s budget represents about half a per cent of total expenditures. Balancing the city’s books will depend on one-time windfalls, such as the sale of real estate and the city’s interest in Enwave, Toronto’s downtown district heating and cooling system, The Globe and Mail has learned.
Gaining council’s approval for this budget is a key test for the mayor. The prospect of cuts to libraries and transit service has prompted strong push-back from the public. A review of core services this summer came up with $27.7-million in cost savings to which councillors could agree and the mayor’s closest allies outvoted him earlier this month on a money-saving measure to stop the collection of extra recycling placed beside blue bins.
Labour costs also will be a factor. Staff cuts are a certainty, with pink slips already being delivered in some departments. In addition, management are being trained to drive Zambonis and deliver front-line services in anticipation of a possible lengthy labour disruption next year.
In selling his budget, Mr. Ford is expected to emphasize the need to hold the line on spending, stressing that a dollar directed to save one service must be balanced by a dollar cut elsewhere.
“This is where the city needs to go,” said a source close to the administration. “This is all about resetting the foundation.”
A city-wide directive asked for 10-per-cent savings in all areas. But some, such as police services, failed to reach that number, meaning others will face even more reductions. “Not all departments are essential,” said the source, characterizing the 10-per-cent request as a “management tool,” used to push staff to find savings.
Using the cost-cutting efforts of other governments as a guide, economist Eric Lascelles predicts lowering Toronto’s spending will be tough. Inflation and a growing population naturally drive up expenditures by about 3-per-cent annually, he said, even without new programs, so holding the line or reducing the money going out generally means fewer services.

“It’s difficult to avoid,” said Mr. Lascelles, chief economist for RBC Global Asset Management, pointing to the federal budgets of Paul Martin as an example. “You have to be out there actively cutting and that’s the challenge. It’s very unpopular and politicians don’t like to be unpopular. That’s what makes it so difficult,” he said.
Critics of Mr. Ford, among them former budget chair Shelley Carroll, argue there is no need to cut spending in a city with a growing population and tax base like Toronto. “We are not that broke,” Councillor Carroll said. “You should be efficient, but rein in spending? There is nothing to rein in here.”


Source: Elizabeth Church (Globe and Mail)

Wednesday, November 16, 2011

Real estate boards push back

The Canadian Real Estate Association might have struck a deal that gives property owners the chance to pay brokers only for the services they want when selling their homes.
But in an odd twist, a year after settling with the Federal Competition Bureau, the real estate association is now facing an internal revolt by several member boards that say they are fed up of paying for services they don’t need.
Indeed, the Greater Montreal Real Estate board – the second largest board in Canada with 10,000 members – says it would consider leaving CREA at the end of 2012 if the association doesn’t cut expenses, and embrace the very same “fee-for-service” model now available to Canadian homeowners.
“What we want here in Quebec – and we assume it’s the same thing at other real estate boards in Canada – is for the CREA to provide us with à la carte services,” Montreal board president Patrick Juanéda told The Gazette in an interview Thursday. “We have too much duplication of services. Why recreate what already exists?
“This is a reality that’s existed for 10 years, and it’s just grown and grown. It’s becoming too expensive; our members are fed up.”
According to the Montreal board, CREA’s national membership dues are to rise 41 per cent between 2010 and 2013, from $220 to $310. CREA dues are used to defray the costs of services like government relations, publicity, meetings and technological tools like the realtor.ca website.
The CREA dues are part of the more than $2,000 in fees paid this year by a Montreal-area broker to his or her industry associations. These fees come at a time when members are seeing their commissions watered down by competition from For Sale By Owner sites and discount agencies where brokers are willing to be paid less for offering limited real estate services.
But a spokesperson for CREA said any fee increases were approved by 80 per cent of association delegates at a 2010 meeting. The fee increase, Pierre Leduc said in an email, was needed so CREA “could keep up to date with the tech tools consumers and Realtors use,” such as new apps developed by the association.
Yet Juanéda says CREA services like its ad campaigns aren’t useful in Quebec, where the entire real estate profession – down to the use of terminology like “broker” as opposed to “agent” – is regulated by provincial law. Indeed, last month CREA actually reimbursed the Montreal board for the dues its members pay for advertising, Juanéda said.
What’s more, CREA’s site, realtor.ca, duplicates the
centris.ca website used by most brokers in Quebec.
The Montreal board says CREA fees have grown by 121 per cent over the last 10 years.
“What company today would spend that much more without trying to trim its own fat?” Juanéda asked.
Although Juanéda says his concerns over duplication of services are shared by real estate professionals across the country, Quebec real estate boards appear to be the most vociferous. One small real estate board – in Granby – has already opted to leave.
A spokesperson for the Toronto Real Estate Board, Canada’s largest board, could not be reached for comment. Neither could ones for the Real Estate Board of Greater Vancouver or the Calgary Real Estate Board.
But in a recent interview, outgoing Calgary board president Ron Esch told Real Estate Magazine that duplication of services is a concern for his members.
“One of the concerns I have for real estate boards (and it includes the provincial associations and CREA) is that we don’t duplicate services at the different levels,” Esch told the magazine. “We need to make sure that we don’t keep piling it on and then the member has to pay for the same service at two or three different levels.”
CREA spokesperson Leduc said the complaints against CREA largely stem from Quebec boards where brokers have been hit by a hefty fee hike from the real estate industry’s watchdog, the Organisme d’autoréglementation du courtage immobilier du Québec, or OACIQ.
“We understand that Quebec boards and their members are under unique pressures due to market conditions and the fact that the regulator in Quebec has nearly doubled its licensing fees,” Leduc wrote.
Leduc, however, acknowledged that the concerns aren’t limited exclusively to Quebec boards.
“As you can imagine, with over 100,000 members and 103 member boards and associations, CREA is always talking with them about various issues, how to meet evolving needs, etc.,” he wrote. “But I’m not aware of any specific ongoing concerns related to the dues increase – as I said almost 80 per cent of the delegates approved it.”
Leduc was not able to say Thursday whether the association would change its model of collecting dues from member boards, but noted that CREA would continue to talk to disgruntled boards.
“We have had, and continue to have, discussions with some Quebec boards, including Montreal, and are working toward a mutually agreeable solution that works for the benefit of all CREA members.”

Source:The Montreal Gazette